![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
|
|||
|
Whilst perusing the net yesterday I stumbled upon the lastest offering from Lamborghini, the Gallardo LP560-4.Can these artisans do no wrong? Miura, Countach, Diablo, Murcielago, Revention and now this. Should be interesting to see the Stig do the business round the TG test track but, he'll have to wait til' 2009...I have been in a gallardo and they are seriously quick, and then some. No doubt this will be just as pokey...http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/04032008/36/lambo-0.htmlFerraris are very nice - if you can afford one - but I prefer Lamborghinis. If you compare the two you'll notice Lambos have always been slightly quicker (F40 and Diablo, F50 and Murcielago). I know the Enzo is very fast but you have to concede, the styling is a bit like Marmite, you either love it or hate it. Ferraris have always been about style, whereas Lamborghinis are more brutish. I'd pick an LP640 over an Enzo I think - providing the choice was available of course!
|
|
|
|
|||
|
it looks quite alot like the revention , which is a good thing! these cars just get better and better, i think this deserves an extra line on the lotto this weekend. come on, it must be me one of these weeks
![]() |
|
|||
|
They're nice but I would much rather have a Ferrari http://images.automobilemag.com/new_and_future_cars/2009/0701_z+2007_ferrari_599_gtb+front.jpgFord GT90http://www.supercarstats.com/cars/ford/gt90/1_full.jpg
|
|
|||
|
Don't really see the point. OK, so they're fast, but where can you use that speed? They're small, uncomfortable, have poor visibility, ridiculously expensive to buy and run, like I say, nothing going for them.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|